Shape of Life - Phoney Peace
Response to "Ultimate Shape" on PBS's "The Shape of Life" and to Geoffrey Millar on the Edge.com. Political corectness may be the only thing making evolutionists see all life as equal.
HOME º PSYCHOLOGY HELP º  PHILOSOPHY HELP º ETHICS º  SCIENCE º MISTAKES º  ECONOMICS  º ESSAYS º SEX º SHAKESPEARE º  ART º  GALLERY º  TOP TEN º HISTORY º MOVIES º STORIES º UFOs º PSYCHICS º  VIDEO GAMES º


Geoffrey Hamilton
April 12, 2002

There is a realization arriving in those who purport to follow evolutionary theory that the concept of progress is a problem. It may just be just some fall-out from politically correct ideas or against eugenics, which are all the irrelevant concerns of ethics, but there is, perhaps, also a new understanding that the forms of life in themselves are not the result of 'progress'.

In the case of the PBS series "The Shape of Life", there may still be progress - although all species are all considered the most adapted to their environment ( as though all the species, win or lose, will get a trophy to take home at the end of the pee wee tournament. )

In the case of Geoffrey Miller's interview in the edge.com, Miller contends that species diversity is caused by sexual selection, meaning that, as Darwin proposed, the strange dances and extra feathering of nests performed by species are all just roundabout ways for individual members of many species to prove they are the best adapted and so the most desirable partners to pass on traits. Miller says these traits themselves take on the sporty or artistic components because of the effect of sexual selection. As these traits are arbitrary to everything but courtship they eventually cause seemingly purposeless differentiation -- purposeless for survival.

These two "progressive" views work together to try to excuse evolutionary theory of some of its flaws while trying to save the phony war between creationism and evolution, which in turn is the prime crutch of evolutionary theory.

GRH