History - Mistakes make true history what it is.
HISTORY History is more than a chronology of events, it is a game we all play with our past in order to satisfy a present need. History is, in all cases, inaccurate, and no matter how hard one tries it is a vast distortion of facts. The only service history does for our present needs is to help us self-manipulate our imagination in order to find a motivation to continue acting and pretending on a day to day basis.
HOME º  PSYCHOLOGY HELP º  PHILOSOPHY HELP º  ETHICS º  SCIENCE º  MISTAKES º ECONOMICS   º ESSAYS º SEX º  SHAKESPEARE º  ART HELP º GALLERY º  TOP TEN º HISTORY º MOVIES º STORIES º UFOs º PSYCHICS º

Where did our chronology come from?

Our personal chronology, the one we actually lived through, is always inaccurate so it is no surprise that there would also be a miscount in the standard chronology of events which we find in the various historical records. The fact that only a few historians care about their own inaccuracies should tell you how they play their game.

Catholic researchers in 1583 by the names of Josephus Scaliger and Dionysius Petavius, are credited with deciding how the chronology of world history would be set. Under the proscriptions of the dogmatic and unscientific Catholic Church they were to end up setting it in stone. Some recent estimations put the date since the time of Augustus at around 1200. Are we eight hundred years younger than we thought? Figure it out for yourself sometime.
Doubting Skeptics
Urban legend debunkers and historians show how their skepticism is BS

Geoffrey Hamilton
December 03, 2005

Historians who doubt the stories of witnesses like to play the reasonable patrician. 'Come, come' they say to the poor little people who are so credulous as to accept eyewitness testimony. Two examples of this was a P.O.W. camp for German prisoners in Texas and the use of exploding shells in 1281 against Japan by Kubla Khan's invasion fleet. Both stories had first hand accounts and contemporary illustrations and both were dismissed as improbable. These historians go so far as to make up elaborate tales to explain these stories as honest mistakes. In the end both stories has archaeological proof to back them up and both are accepted now. However, this does not let this pack of whelps off the hook. They need to apologize and start over again in regards to their methodology. Improbability theory is their biggest area for reform.....

continued
all essays

TO MYTH OR NOT TO MYTH

Geoffrey Hamilton

January 16, 1995


Parenthetical comments rarely have a content startling enough to outweigh an entire piece of writing which surrounds it, but one by Thomas Mann may do more than that, ". . .can one live and die more significantly or worthily than in the celebration of a myth ". Here Thomas Mann describes, with a rhetorical question, what is the highest aim for humanity, celebrating (honouring) a myth. He implies that living and dying should be done for a myth because it is the most significant and worthy (valuable) aim. His use of "a" means he does not intend to point to any specific myth. He does not ask why it is so but he has, without perhaps intending it, summed up the meaning of life, despite any potential moral implications of the comment.

Mann wrote his summation in a timely period for testing it, in 1936, in the midst of the greatest struggle humanity had up to that time experienced - if the rise of communism, fascism, and their respective reactionaries' rise is seen as the beginning. No part of the world was immune from the consequences of this prep war given how imperialism had laid the .....
continued
all essays
"God and History will remember your judgment!" Haile Selassie to League of Nations 1936