Shakespeare Oxfordian resource - psychology, biography, Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
FREE ENTIRE PLAY The greatest writer ever is not the person you think it is. William Shakespeare of Stratford upon Avon was a fraud. See how this came to be and why ORSON WELLES, SIGMUND FREUD and LESLIE HOWARD came to believe it too.
HOME º  PSYCHOLOGY HELP º  PHILOSOPHY HELP º  ETHICS º  SCIENCE º  MISTAKES º ECONOMICS   º ESSAYS º SEX º  SHAKESPEARE º  ART HELP º GALLERY º  TOP TEN º HISTORY º MOVIES º STORIES º UFOs º PSYCHICS º
Edward the Great: The True Story of Shake-speare
The full screenplay dramatizing the whole story of how Edward de Vere was Shakespeare - free to read.


Oxfordian Help
all Shakespeare essays


Links regarding Edward de Vere
Shakespeare Oxford Society. American  A well developed site.

More links  many more links


Compare Shakspere and de Vere  Good notes


All Shake-speare all the time  most links


News  Keanu Reeves is a believer too. Check the end of page.


The Chronicle Mirror - Shakespeare's (Edward de Vere's) models for his characters
Geoffrey Hamilton
November 26, 1996

How does Shakespeare build his characters? It turns out by modeling them on people he knew. The dramatic techniques, of foil, rhetoric, structure, and action all make more sense once the historical models are discovered and outlined. As you will see Hotspur is made Hal's foil for contemporary reasons, Polonius' rhetoric is meant to ridicule a famous personage, and even plot structures are biographical and mimic contemporary events.

The play Hamlet is often used as an authoritative text to study the nature of art and of drama in particular. The character Hamlet has two famous passages touching on drama. The first states, "The players. . . are the abstracts and brief chronicles of the time". The other gives a complementary purpose, ". . . to hold, as 'twere, the mirror up to nature; to show virtue her own feature, scorn her own image . . . ."

If the question as to how Shakespeare built his characters is going to be addressed, I think it is fair to use these two precepts as his artistic foundation. What the precepts suggest is the possibility that actual people and events are chronicled and mirrored within some aspects of the plays. I will show that such was the case. By using his contemporaries as models he engender a humanity onto his sources.

To demonstrate the wide recognition precepts similar to Shakespeare's were held in his own age, there is the famous circumstance surrounding the rebellion of Essex and Shakespeare's friend, Southhampton....
continued
all essays
Fry Bloom - Northrop Fry, Harold Bloom don't know Shakespeare.
Geoffrey Hamilton
August 23, 2003

Two of contemporary Shakespeare scholarship's most eminent names are also two of the most ignorant defenders of Shakespeare orthodoxy. Northrop Frye and Harold Bloom are required reading when it comes to Shakespeare studies, yet as they base much of their surmising on the so-called life of Shakespeare of Stratford upon Avon, they do much to devalue their life's work. Each of these critics reflects their comments off of this "life" as though there is no doubt, but they are well aware of the doubts and have refused to look into the matter. In both cases they have, by their words and actions, refused to even examine the evidence directly and, so, have brought discredit onto themselves.

Frye introduces his "On Shakespeare" by stating, "I'm not going into the so-called controversies about whether the plays were written by someone else or not-----they're not serious issues." Then he belies his certainty with off-the-shelf defensiveness saying that Shakespeare, like most writers of his time, did not impress himself on his age, so that is why we know so little about him. A few pages later he mentions in passing how the play Richard II was used to stir up the masses in the Essex Rebellion and how the Queen is quoted as believing this play to be a representation of her. Unlike most writers of the time who were tortured and imprisoned for minor offenses and their books burned, like Nashe, Jonson, Marlowe and Kyd, this most treasonous play doesn't even get the honour of an query into the author's name. Whoever the author was he was ignored while everyone else connected to the play's performance, from two high ranking earls to lowly beggers, were named and/or killed. Here could have been proof of Shakspere of Stratford's authorship, but once again evidence is not forthcoming. Frye is so unaware....
continued
all essays

BOOKS ABOUT EDWARD DE VERE

The Mysterious William Shakespeare, Charlton Ogburn Jr., 1984
...Compares William Shakspere to Edward de Vere


The Life Story of Edward de Vere as "William Shakespeare", Percy Allen

Every Man Out of His Humour, Ben Jonson, 1590s
...First hand satire on the Shakespeare pretender.


Story of the Learned Pig, "Learned Pig"-an officer of the Royal Navy 1786
....Later satire on pretentions of Shakspere of Stratford


"Shakespeare" Identified as Edward de Vere the 17th Earl of Oxford, J. Thomas Looney, 1920
...The first book on the subject


This Star of England, Dorthy and Charlton Ogburn
...Long but the best book on the subject


Shake-speare: the Man Behind the Name, Dorthy and Charlton Ogburn Jr.


Alias Shakespeare, Joseph Sobran, 1997



How did Edward de Vere first become Shakespeare for you?




or email
comments
@gamegene.com

Nietzsche in the 1880's, "The Great poet creates only out of his own reality...I know of no more heart-rending reading than Shakspeare... but to feel in this way one must be profound, abyss, philosopher...I am instinctively certain that lord Bacon is the originator, the self-tormentor of this uncanniest species of liturature...We do not know nearly enough about Lord Bacon...." Close, but unfortunately no one was aware of de Vere in Germany at the time. This was his only option among the lords so he tried it on for size.